Tuesday, May 16, 2006

jeez- that last one was getting a little negative - but it was a sudden realization of ours last night when we watched a prominent democratic representative advocate invasion of privacy - he certainly knows damn well whose checking up on his finances -

ANYWAY, so they released the NEW VIDEO OF THE PENTAGON....
it's gonna get real nasty, boys and girls

on a lighter note I learned of the new images on Heraldo!
He was talking about In Plane Site.
Joel and I thought he was a good man for getting the word out even if it's Heraldo and hokey, but only thought that he was fluffing the journalism and showing NEW footage that we had seen already on the documentary.

NOPE the government released the film - not just the handful of slides that THEY had released earlier (apparently just not officially!)
If you can believe this - the original shots were numbered 11, 12, 15, 18 and had the date stamp of 9/12/01 - I can show you, but the film doesn't have the time and date running like they were in the stills that were non-officially released

heartbreaking is that the size difference is very clear - won't take long -

also, heartbreaking is what

MSNBC reported in it's final paragraph
"Cheryl Irwin, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon, said the families of the victims of the Pentagon attack were consulted before the videos were posted on the Pentagon's website."


I looked back at the beginning of the article
HEADLINE: Pentagon attack that killed 189
then checked the tally they listed again
59 and 5 hijackers were killed
125 were killed IN THE BUILDING

in the only wing that was being renovated, there were no bodies recovered, and all the footage of cadaver/rescue dogs show them sitting around bored.

aside from i used to work in the aerial industry- the mounting issues started to just recently REALLY get out of hand with the trial of the accused conspirator (forgive i'm not leaving the blog again to look up how to spell his name, sorry)-
what a wangled teb we weave - what i didn't get is why there was so much falsified evidence submitted during the ...trial - a lot of cell phone call transcripts just came out of nowhere, plus wreckage photos that showed damage, and advanced rust weathering that couldn't have happen in that location
the chance of a cell phone working at that altitude is .0004% - PROVEN so there...
the first ever photos of wreckage of flight 93 in a FOREST when we all watched a vacant field with a big black hole in it for 2 hours-
i didn't understand if they were just an extreme token of sentiment to the people who lost their families, for solace, and answers-
it is ...just like the Pentagon families are getting now -

the government not taking responsibility for already the aired images of the Pentagon video they unofficially released means that IN PLANE SITE and LOOSE CHANGE are made to look libel and even less credible because of the inconsistencies in the date and time codes - and for not showing the whole sequence of frames -

even though all other security cameras from the businesses across the street have never been heard of OFFICIALLY or UNofficially since the Feds showed up and confiscated them right after the explosion

that trial may be over for the guilty Terrorist but served as a catalyst for this information to be manipulated, edited and re-edited, regardless of physics, ethics, or possibilty - and given back to us on Heraldo -

until what is real and what wasn't will be become so muddied that what really happened on 911 will be made not worth the journey to figure out - again

just like every other day
at least someone listens to Heraldo

1 comment:

Almighty One said...

I've heard a little bit on this, it's kinda freaky, and makes you think,but the Government is dumb, but come on, not that dumb!